Vernon E. Peltz
Attorney at Law

FORFEITURES


Home
Criminal Defense
DUI/DWI
Sex Offenses
Conspiracy
Bail
Extradition
Forfeitures
Probation Violations
Drugs
Appeals
Post Conviction
Expungement Conviction
Firearms Violations
Drivers License Points
Juvenile Law
Federal Rules Of Criminal Procedure
Aizona Revised Statutes Title 13 - Criminal Code
Aizona Revised Statutes Title 28
Arizona Interstate 8, 10, 17, 19, 40
Warrants in Arizona
Vernon E. Peltz
PMB 351 7925A North Oracle
Tucson, Arizona 86704-6316
(520) 623-5225
Email: Vernon@vpeltzlaw.com


Law Applicable to Asset Forfeiture

If gov. starts case after 60 days prop. Must be returned, State v. Gill, 11 P.3d 1043 (Ariz.App. 2000).

Verified Petition for Remission or Claim must contain (1) The Caption. (2) Have Claimant’s address. (3) Explain Claimant’s interest in the property. (4) Explain when and how Claimant acquired the property. (5), (6) & (7) Give legal reasons and facts why the property is not subject to forfeiture and (8) Request the relief sought, ARS 13-4311.E. 1-8.

The requirements of A.R.S. 13-4311.E. 1-8, must be strictly followed or Claimant’s case will be dismissed, Matter of $70,169.91 in U.S. Currency, 172 Ariz. 15 (Ariz.App. 1991).

The Fourth Amendment applies to forfeiture cases, U.S. v. $191,910.00, 16 F.3d (9th Cir. 1994).

Hearsay is admitted in a forfeiture case if reliable, Matter of One, 176 Ariz. 294 (Ariz.App. 1993).

The government has the initial probably cause burden of proof, thereafter Claimant must prove his property is not forfeitable, U.S. Currency Amount of $315,900.00, 183 Ariz. 208 (Ariz.App. 1995).

The innocent owner defense does not allow property to be forfeited unless “the owner had some connection with the unlawful act (In re One 1965 Ford Mustang, 105 Ariz. 293, 301 (Ariz. 1970)).”

Forfeiture can be punitive and not remedial, State v. Leyva, 184 Ariz. 439 (Ariz.App. 1995).

When a civil sanction is imposed after a criminal sentence, Double Jeopardy is violated if the civil sanction is grossly disproportionate to the crime, United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 (1989).

Prosecution can be stopped by a forfeiture, Fitzgerald v. Superior, 173 Ariz. 539 (Ariz.App. 1992).